• To: "Stephen E. Beller" <sbeller@n...>
• Subject: Re: Data streams
• From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>
• Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 16:35:55 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <002501c4dbec$a8a336d0$6501a8c0@dell8100>
• References: <002501c4dbec$a8a336d0$6501a8c0@dell8100>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0RC1 (Macintosh/20041201)

Stephen E. Beller wrote:
> Yes! This would be an economical use of XML. Problem is, I just don't see
> any value in it. It can't be used to populate a spreadsheet and it has no
> semantic value. 


Sure it can. You would need to define the schema you need/want for 
excel, but it can be done and it is not difficult.

best,
-Rob


> You'd be better off keeping the comma and saving 6
> characters. But I think you're on the right track.
>

• References:
  • RE: Data streams
    • From: "Stephen E. Beller" <sbeller@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Data streams
• Next by Date: Re: Data streams
• Previous by thread: RE: Data streams
• Next by thread: Re: Data streams
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread