• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Issues with XML and Semantic Web ?
• From: Garfield <xmlstar@g...>
• Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 17:05:19 +0530
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uAaCb/k//mEtcc+Pim1l1TAnxM+YwE95xOCkH4fCOaZCBjwlCF/cnkRHQBCdGmkXt/mGLSTyehoPdlfqNE0k7hk+eEnsjZO6OR/BE2HOtsRgrewxkS2Esk7m3TkuYnw5zn2lRvLGPgVaSUusB2El+H46W5HIeB9IJNo9v4zJBYo=
• Reply-to: Garfield <xmlstar@g...>

Hi All,

I apologize if this is not the target audience for this query. But if
any of you feel that this is a question that is worth answering, do
take a peek.
I was running this long philosophical thought on the future of the
Semantic Web and all the excitement that surrounds it. Between all
this excitement, well, I just had a few questions on the following.
1) What are the significant open issues with the Semantic Web ?
2) Is the choice of XML as the syntactic representation of the data
model a long term "right option" ?
3) Your thoughts on the Complexity of the current ontology expression
languages like OWL, DAML+OIL etc.
4) Your thoughts on the adaptability curve for the Ontologies across
Enterprises for the next couple of years and beyond.

Your thoughts are valuable . Dont keep it with you !!!!!

Thanks!

Gar.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Issues with XML and Semantic Web ?
    • From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
  • Re: Issues with XML and Semantic Web ?
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>

• Prev by Date: SV: Number of active public XML schemas
• Next by Date: Re: Issues with XML and Semantic Web ?
• Previous by thread: [ANN] XML Standards Library 2.1 : Updated 2004-11-09
• Next by thread: Re: Issues with XML and Semantic Web ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread