• To: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>
• Subject: Re: Canonicalizer that uses XML Schemas (rather than DTDs)?
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:46:43 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>, "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <41A270F4.3080807@j...>

> > 2. Can you think of other differences that would occur if XML Schemas
> >    were used by a canonicalizer rather than DTDs?

Schema makes no guarantees about being round-trippable.  Going from
lexical space, to value space, and back, might do "bad" things (from a
c14n viewpoint).
	/r$
-- 
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview      http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

• References:
  • Re: Canonicalizer that uses XML Schemas (rather than DTDs)?
    • From: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: binary xml for large collections of structured data?
• Next by Date: [ADMIN] (was Re: binary XML API and scientific use cases [Re: [ANN] nux-1.0beta2 release)
• Previous by thread: Re: Canonicalizer that uses XML Schemas (rather than DTDs)?
• Next by thread: Re: Canonicalizer that uses XML Schemas (rather than DTDs)?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread