• To: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>,"Jeff Rafter" <lists@j...>,"Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>
• Subject: RE: Excellent Insight on Standards Development vs Invention
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:38:08 -0800
• Cc: "Michael Champion" <michaelc.champion@g...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcTJC7TlXb+tmFGWSJ+1mtw7fibFOQAAXYEwAADO71A=
• Thread-topic: Excellent Insight on Standards Development vs Invention

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@s...] 
> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 3:15 PM
> To: 'Jeff Rafter'; Joshua Allen
> Cc: Dare Obasanjo; 'Michael Champion'; xml-dev@l...
> Subject: RE:  Excellent Insight on Standards 
> Development vs Invention
> 
> Oddly, of the hundreds of XSLT stylesheets I see in an 
> average week, a miniscule proportion have anything to do with 
> RSS. Perhaps that explains my astonishment.

In a former life, I saw hundreds of XML schemas in an average week, a
miniscule proper [if any] having anything to do with RSS. I wouldn't
have drawn the conclusion that this somehow means that W3C XML Schema
was more successful than RSS by any measure of the word. 

--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
In any contest between power and patience, bet on patience. .      

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.  

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Performance in Client-Server Interactions
• Next by Date: Re: Seeking implementation advice on WFC:PE Between Declarations in Production
• Previous by thread: RE: Excellent Insight on Standards Development vs Invention
• Next by thread: Re: Excellent Insight on Standards Development vs Invention
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread