Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Ronald Bourret scripsit: > But here's another way to ask the question. Are there enough people for > whom a non-XML syntax for XML Schemas would be useful that it's worth > deriving such a thing? After all, the general feeling on this list the > other day was that the shorthand form of Relax NG was easier and more > widely used than the XML form. Kilian Stillhard and Erik Wilde designed and implemented just such a syntax early in 2003; see http://dret.net/projects/xscs/ . I could quibble with a few details, but if I needed to write an XML Schema and couldn't use Trang for some reason, I'd surely use their syntax. The conversion software is freely redistributable but not Open Source. To get a taste, the Schema for Schemas is online at http://dret.net/projects/xscs/XMLSchema.xsc . -- I marvel at the creature: so secret and John Cowan so sly as he is, to come sporting in the pool cowan@c... before our very window. Does he think that http://www.reutershealth.com Men sleep without watch all night? --Faramir http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
|
