• To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>
• Subject: RE: Imprimaturs - W3C and ISO
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 23:21:15 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>, Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>, "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D10395FF57@R...>

> The talks were dominated by tools vendors and implementers.

Hm, what do you mean by implementors?  Only a couple were actually schema
implementors, and a bunch more were implementing "XML," but I don't think
it was more than half.

My feeling (and travel made me miss the first day) was that XSD is
something that can be lived with.  The fact that so many people know there
are alternatives is, by itself, very significant.

I think there's a good chance that MSFT will support Relax with the XSD
type system, perhaps in 12-24 months.

	/r$

--
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview      http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

• References:
  • RE: Imprimaturs - W3C and ISO
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Imprimaturs - W3C and ISO
• Next by Date: XML Schema assistance
• Previous by thread: RE: Imprimaturs - W3C and ISO
• Next by thread: RE: Imprimaturs - W3C and ISO
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread