• To: 'Gerald Bauer' <luxorxul@y...>, Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>, Don Demsak <donxml@g...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: What is XAML? A technique? A language? Both? XML# or XML++?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:00:21 -0600

If it is an HTML alternative, why is that a problem? 
The fact of XML means alternatives are possible and 
even desirable to other languages.  That is evolution. 
For every language I can think of, there are alternatives.
 
Why should everyone buy into the HTML monoculture?

len


From: Gerald Bauer [mailto:luxorxul@y...]

   Finally, allow me to highlight some descriptions
that show that XAML is clearly targeted as an HTML
alternative:

  * Paragraph -	Implements a block-level element used
to render text in a paragraph. Rendering behavior is
analagous to that of the paragraph element in HTML.

  * Note - Implements a Note element, which is
analagous to the BLOCKQUOTE Element in HTML.

  * and so on

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: What is XAML? A technique? A language? Both? XML# o r XML++?
    • From: Gerald Bauer <luxorxul@y...>

• Prev by Date: RE: What is XAML? A technique? A language? Both? XML# or XML++?
• Next by Date: Re: XAML vs XUL [was: What is XAML? A technique? A language?Both? XML# or XML++?]
• Previous by thread: Re: What is XAML? A technique? A language? Both? XML# or XML++?
• Next by thread: RE: What is XAML? A technique? A language? Both? XML# o r XML++?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread