• To: "'Burak Emir'" <Burak.Emir@e...>,"'Chizzolini Stefano'" <chist@c...>
• Subject: RE: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 11:19:08 -0000
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <4188B213.50903@e...>
• Thread-index: AcTBj6B5fkYKqnlbRDOuREiPFHIpHAABtyiA

> Who needs to dynamically generate schemas? The whole point of 
> schemas is 
> to be a widespread, well understood description of instances.

There was someone with that need writing to the list a few days ago. It
seems entirely legitimate to me to apply different schemas to the same
document at different stages of a workflow, or for senders of documents to
apply stronger validation criteria than recipients of the same documents.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
    • From: "TAN Kuan Hui" <kuanhui@x...>
  • Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
    • From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
  • Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
    • From: Burak Emir <Burak.Emir@e...>

• References:
  • dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Numberof active public XML schemas
    • From: Burak Emir <Burak.Emir@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Describing hierarchies with XML
• Next by Date: Re: Describing hierarchies with XML
• Previous by thread: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Numberof active public XML schemas
• Next by thread: Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread