• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Subject: Re: Relax NG, Thoughts, etc.
• From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>
• Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 02:12:43 +0400 (AMT)
• Cc: "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206969@h...>

Hi,

W3C XML Schema and Relax NG are aimed at different targets:
the former is to describe to data models, the latter is to
define markup grammars.

David

> XSD, and I've written a DTD or two in my day, but 
> this situation where the W3C and certain very 
> large unnamed vendors ignore RELAX isn't right. 
> OTOH, based on that admittedly off the cuff 
> poll (god knows some might have thought I 
> was asking if they preferred LSD to relaxing), 
> it seems not enough users know about RELAX NG 
> or appreciate the merits.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Relax NG, Thoughts, etc.
    • From: "Nathan Young" <natyoung@c...>

• References:
  • Relax NG, Thoughts, etc.
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>

• Prev by Date: Relax NG, Thoughts, etc.
• Next by Date: Re: Why are XML crowds older?
• Previous by thread: Relax NG, Thoughts, etc.
• Next by thread: Re: Relax NG, Thoughts, etc.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread