• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Number of active public XML schemas
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 11:36:51 -0800
• In-reply-to: <f5bmzy152lr.fsf@e...>
• References: <4180B880.8030604@r...> <f5bmzy152lr.fsf@e...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

Henry S. Thompson wrote:

> One interesting mearure will be the percentage of _your_ schemas that
> I also found -- I'll check that some time this week and let you know.

That will be interesting. I should also point out that a significant 
number of the schemas I found are DTDs, so it would also be interesting 
to see how many DTDs you can find through Google. (If I recall 
correctly, I also found a couple of Relax NG schemas.)

Not sure why people chose DTDs instead of XML Schemas, but I suspect 
it's either because they were coming from the SGML world or because they 
started work before XML Schemas were a recommendation.

-- Ron

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Number of active public XML schemas
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>

• References:
  • Re: Number of active public XML schemas
    • From: ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: Re: XPATH on a PocketPC 2003 SE
• Next by Date: Re: Number of active public XML schemas
• Previous by thread: Re: Number of active public XML schemas
• Next by thread: Re: Number of active public XML schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread