• To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>
• Subject: Re: Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: XML 2004 weblog items?)
• From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
• Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:04:21 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D103B24D3C@R...>
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D103B24D3C@R...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i

On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 01:52:31PM -0800, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> Interesting, so if I'm writing an XML Web Service end point I should
> trust third parties to do the well-formedness and validity checking as a
> "performance enhancement"?
'phew, I'm glad I didn't suggest that :-)

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/

• References:
  • RE: Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: XML 2004 weblog items?)
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: XML 20 04 weblog items?)
• Next by Date: RE: Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: XML 2004 weblog items?)
• Previous by thread: RE: Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: XML 2004 weblog items?)
• Next by thread: RE: Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: XML 2004 weblog items?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread