• To: Burak Emir <Burak.Emir@e...>
• Subject: Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 09:11:48 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@b...>, XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <418A345A.5070102@e...>

> I considered the schema part more important than the ports, methodnames
> etc. But maybe these need to be considered as crucial for a web service
> as its input and output types, in which case you have a point.

Oh no, not me.  I'm quite happy to say that the "contract" is a schema.
And generating WSDL from a schema is a reasonable thing to do.
	/r$
--
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview      http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

• References:
  • Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
    • From: Burak Emir <Burak.Emir@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• Next by Date: Re: Antwort: RE: Antwort: [XOM-interest] Character conversion problem
• Previous by thread: Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• Next by thread: RE: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread