• To: markus bauer <bauer_markus81@h...>
• Subject: Re: current strengths and weaknesses of xml schema languages
• From: Vladimir Gapeyev <vgapeyev@s...>
• Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:44:58 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <BAY14-F1038E2C8085E2BC95D4609EBC70@p...>
• References: <BAY14-F1038E2C8085E2BC95D4609EBC70@p...>

On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, markus bauer wrote:

> can sb. give me a realistic view of the current strengths and weaknesses of
> XML schema languages (xml schema, relax ng, schematron, dtds etc.) and its
> (appropriate) uses?

For the theoretically inclined, there is a paper by Murata, Lee and Many,
"Taxonomy of XML Schema Languages Using Formal Language Theory" at Extreme
Markup 2001:

http://www.mulberrytech.com/Extreme/Proceedings/html/2001/Murata01/EML2001Murata01.html

VG

• References:
  • current strengths and weaknesses of xml schema languages
    • From: "markus bauer" <bauer_markus81@h...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Why are XML crowds older?
• Next by Date: Re: Why are XML crowds older?
• Previous by thread: Re: current strengths and weaknesses of xml schema languages
• Next by thread: Re: licensing ... [Re: binary XML API and scientific use cases [Re: [ANN] nux-1.0beta2 release
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread