• To: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@m...>
• Subject: Re: Excellent Insight on Standards Development vs Invention
• From: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>
• Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:01:08 -0800
• Cc: Michael Kay <mike@s...>, Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>, Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <0E36FD96D96FCA4AA8E8F2D199320E52038840AC@R...>
• References: <0E36FD96D96FCA4AA8E8F2D199320E52038840AC@R...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)

> True; context is important.  I think it is fair to restrict to apps
> which directly produce/consume XML and for which this is a critical
> implementation detail.  And then when I say "success", I measure in
> terms of end-users who use the app on a daily basis; in terms of total
> number and in terms of breadth.

XSLT. Just a guess though. I suspect that the usage of XSLT is still 
just a smidge wider than RSS-- especially considering how many of the 
prominent RSS aggregators utilize XSLT to handle RSS/ATOM/etc. Apart 
from that there are many more businesses using XSLT than are using RSS.

Cheers,
Jeff Rafter

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Excellent Insight on Standards Development vs Invention
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• References:
  • RE: Excellent Insight on Standards Development vs Invention
    • From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Excellent Insight on Standards Development vs Invention
• Next by Date: Re: XML Performance in Client-Server Interactions
• Previous by thread: RE: Excellent Insight on Standards Development vs Invention
• Next by thread: RE: Excellent Insight on Standards Development vs Invention
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread