• To: "Michael Champion" <michaelc.champion@g...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Imprimaturs - W3C and ISO
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 17:08:40 -0800
• Thread-index: AcTAd/0W1KLhYRlBT4CdnlnKOScA3wAAG9Gw
• Thread-topic: Imprimaturs - W3C and ISO

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Champion [mailto:michaelc.champion@g...] 
> Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 5:05 PM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  Imprimaturs - W3C and ISO
>  
> Big vendors and their customers aren't going to adopt 
> Schematron or RNG just because they are official 
> international standards, but neither are they going to scorn 
> them because they don't come from W3C.
>  My guess is that they will adopt them when (if?) it becomes 
> obvious that a significant chunk of people are getting their 
> work done better/faster/cheaper with them than with XSD.
> 
> If these technologies are really as good as most people on 
> this list seem to think, it may not take much to get the ball rolling.

Exactly. 

--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Never eat yellow snow.       

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.  

• Prev by Date: Re: Imprimaturs - W3C and ISO
• Next by Date: Re: Imprimaturs - W3C and ISO
• Previous by thread: RE: Imprimaturs - W3C and ISO
• Next by thread: RE: Imprimaturs - W3C and ISO
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread