• To: 'Nathan Young' <natyoung@c...>, "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Why are XML crowds older?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:43:11 -0600

John can answer better, but they may be part of the 
proceedings.  John was doing an excellent job with 
examples of things that RelaxNG can do that can't 
be done by other approaches.   He was comfortable 
with the material and easy going with the 
audience.  He fielded questions quickly. It's hard to 
do that in real time.  I don't know if the slides 
can do justice to the presentation because his 
confidence is a significant part of the clarity.

len


From: Nathan Young [mailto:natyoung@c...]

I'm super interested in the RelaxNG presentation that caught your  
attention.  Is that available online anywhere? A quick search turned up  
lots of relaxNG - John Cowan results (obviously) and I found his tutorials  
 from conventions in past years but nothing that seemed to fit what you  
speak of.

• Prev by Date: RE: Canonicalizer that uses XML Schemas (rather than DTDs)?
• Next by Date: Re: Canonicalizer that uses XML Schemas (rather than DTDs)?
• Previous by thread: Re: Why are XML crowds older?
• Next by thread: RE: Why are XML crowds older?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread