• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Hostility to "binary XML"
• From: richard@i... (Richard Tobin)
• Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:15:56 +0000 (GMT)
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <41A3B1AC.9070507@j...>
• Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

>I have always been of the opinion that, at least for certain classes of 
>documents, validation could be used to speed the process up. If certain 
>VCs were considered fatal errors, then character checking would be 
>reduced for start tags (i.e., instead of checking that a character is a 
>valid XML character, you would check if the name is valid according to 
>the DTD).

I think that if you really wanted to, you could get 99% of this speed
up anyway.  Don't check the characters, check the name against the
DTD, and then only if it isn't declared check the characters and
then fake a declaration so it will be quick next time.

-- Richard

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Re: Hostility to "binary XML"
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: Re: Hostility to "binary XML"
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: Hostility to "binary XML"
    • From: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Hostility to "binary XML"
• Next by Date: Re: Web Services/SOA (was RE: XML 2004 weblogitems?)
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Hostility to "binary XML"
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Hostility to "binary XML"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread