• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Seeking implementation advice on WFC:PE Between Declarationsin Production
• From: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>
• Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:03:04 -0800
• In-reply-to: <4194F639.2070306@j...>
• References: <4194F639.2070306@j...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)

 > This would be similar to the implementation of VC: Proper
> Declaration/PE Nesting [2]? It seems that the only two cases where the 
> VC and WFC are not redundant is that the WFC adds the additional 
> constraint that a PEReference (the actual ref, not the replacement 
> value) cannot be started in one entity and ended in another and that a 
> conditional section cannot be started in one entity and ended in another. *

To clarify, if a conditional section started in one entity and ended in 
another this would also bring in VC: Proper Conditional Section/PE 
Nesting [1].

Also to clarify, I am aware that the WFC only applies to PE refs between 
markup decls-- not in markup decls (I am not sure of the implications... 
as I can't figure out how you could split any of these productions 
across a PE boundary *within* a markupDecl).

[1] 
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/REC-xml-20040204-review.html#condsec-nesting

As always, hopelessly confused,
Jeff Rafter

• Follow-Ups:
  • Connecting xml to xsl
    • From: Mattison <peacock@p...>

• References:
  • Seeking implementation advice on WFC:PE Between Declarations in Production
    • From: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>

• Prev by Date: Seeking implementation advice on WFC:PE Between Declarations in Production
• Next by Date: Connecting xml to xsl
• Previous by thread: Seeking implementation advice on WFC:PE Between Declarations in Production
• Next by thread: Connecting xml to xsl
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread