• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 21:16:49 -0800
• In-reply-to: <cc159a4a0411030805712ac20e@m...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE072068DA@h...> <cc159a4a0411030805712ac20e@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

Peter Hunsberger wrote:

> Exactly, that's why I questioned whether an XML schema was ever the
> best "model"....

One woulda thought so, but there seem to be an awful lot of people who
want to do their modeling in XML Schemas.

-- Ron

• References:
  • RE: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
  • Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
    • From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• Next by Date: Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• Previous by thread: Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• Next by thread: RE: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread