• To: "'Burak Emir'" <Burak.Emir@e...>
• Subject: RE: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 13:18:35 -0000
• Cc: "'Chizzolini Stefano'" <chist@c...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <4188C733.7010407@e...>
• Thread-index: AcTBm5ZdV/ticxdBRc2jpD/fo8VrgAAC6Ctg

> Granted, but does that require a "dynamically generated" schema?

If you can think of a better way of maintaining several schemas that are
identical in most respects, but vary in terms of which elements/attributes
are optional, then let me know.

This is a classic "conditional compilation" scenario, and for languages
based on XML, XSLT provides a powerful tool for such use cases.


Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
    • From: Burak Emir <Burak.Emir@e...>

• References:
  • Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
    • From: Burak Emir <Burak.Emir@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• Next by Date: Re: Imprimaturs - W3C and ISO
• Previous by thread: Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• Next by thread: Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread