• To: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
• Subject: Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:55:20 -0500
• Cc: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>, Richard Tobin <richard@i...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <4192AA74.4010003@z...>
• References: <cc159a4a04111007342f5b9042@m...> <20041110154323.D13EE1A0B62@m...> <cc159a4a0411100829314d0c4b@m...> <4192AA74.4010003@z...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)

Both XQuery and XSLT are non-procedural. To the extent that this is a 
well-defined term, which it isn't.

Jonathan

Rick Marshall wrote:
> the trick with xslt is that it's a specification of what to do, not an 
> instruction to do something. ie it is truly non-procedural.
> 
> the paradigm shift is from programming (giving a clear step by step set 
> of instructions) to specifying (if you have an x then do y). this is 
> subtle but critical.

• References:
  • Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
    • From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
  • Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
    • From: richard@i... (Richard Tobin)
  • Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
    • From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
  • Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
• Next by Date: Re: RDF necessary to SW? - was Issues with XML and Semantic Web ?
• Previous by thread: Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
• Next by thread: RE: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread