• To: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@l...>
• Subject: Re: Issues with XML and Semantic Web ?
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 20:29:44 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <FEF4858E8AB32D4EAC2CF2A7D85386EB0B254374@l...>
• References: <FEF4858E8AB32D4EAC2CF2A7D85386EB0B254374@l...>
• Sender: Tim.Bray@S...

On Nov 9, 2004, at 9:18 AM, DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO) wrote:

> the amount of practical, usable RDF data still seems
> remarkably small. I've been compiling a list at rdfdata.org, and it's
> getting harder and harder to find new entries.
>
> One could argue that we don't need RDF to build a viable semantic web, 
> but
> RDF does address problems that need to be addressed, so if you pull it 
> out
> of the equation something else needs to be plugged back in.

Just a reminder that the RDF.net challenge is still open: see 
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/05/21/RDFNet (you can skip 
all the history and markup-pedantry and jump to the challenge itself, 
at the bottom of that essay).  -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • RDF necessary to SW? - was Issues with XML and Semantic Web ?
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
  • Re: Issues with XML and Semantic Web ?
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• References:
  • RE: Issues with XML and Semantic Web ?
    • From: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@l...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Issues with XML and Semantic Web ?
• Next by Date: Re: Issues with XML and Semantic Web ?
• Previous by thread: Re: Issues with XML and Semantic Web ?
• Next by thread: Re: Issues with XML and Semantic Web ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread