• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: When to check entity WFness according to 4.3.2
• From: richard@i... (Richard Tobin)
• Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:09:05 +0100 (BST)
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <005801c4bb69$b01b8410$9e539696@citkwaclaww2k>
• Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

>But the prolog is part of the document production, so if an entity declared
>in the prolog is not well-formed, then should that not mean the document
>is not well-formed? 

The requirement is that "Each of the parsed entities which is
referenced directly or indirectly within the document is well-formed."
An entity is certainly *declared* in the prolog, but it is not
*referenced* there.

-- Richard

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: When to check entity WFness according to 4.3.2
    • From: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>
  • Re: When to check entity WFness according to 4.3.2
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>

• References:
  • Re: When to check entity WFness according to 4.3.2
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Next by Date: RE: After XQuery, are we done?
• Previous by thread: Re: When to check entity WFness according to 4.3.2
• Next by thread: Re: When to check entity WFness according to 4.3.2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread