• To: Michael Kay <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Subject: Re: Why *is* XQuery taking so long?
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 11:39:59 -0400
• Cc: 'Tim Bray' <tbray@t...>, xml-dev@l..., "'Thong (Tum) Nguyen'" <tum@v...>
• In-reply-to: <20041022153259.EUPD12530.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@Turtle>
• References: <20041022153259.EUPD12530.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@Turtle>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)

Michael Kay wrote:

> If the WG had followed all the advice they got three years ago then they
> would have produced nothing whatsoever.
> 
> Many of us could have produced a better query language much quicker, but
> only by *ignoring* the advice of others.

That has to be the best line of this whole thread.

Jonathan

• References:
  • RE: Why *is* XQuery taking so long?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: XML Data Modellling/Linking (was RE: After XQuery, are we done?)
• Next by Date: RE: After XQuery, are we done?
• Previous by thread: RE: Why *is* XQuery taking so long?
• Next by thread: Re: Why *is* XQuery taking so long?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread