• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Getting specs/standards right (was UPA and schema handling)
• From: ian.graham@u...
• Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:22:17 -0400
• In-reply-to: <4173DF6A.7060702@d...>
• References: <20041018144435.BYLN20770.mta10-svc.ntlworld.com@Turtle> <4173DF6A.7060702@d...>
• User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1

Quoting Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>:

A test suite would be lovely. I don't see how you can drive for standards
conformance without one. I admit it's a cost, but I think it is a necessary one. 

> Michael Kay wrote:
 
> 
> A W3C standard can't become a Recommendation without implementations. 
> It's useful to have tests that show what has been correctly implemented, 
> so that we can demonstrate that there really are implementations.
> 
> Jonathan
> 

• References:
  • RE: Getting specs/standards right (was UPA and schema handling)
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
  • Re: Getting specs/standards right (was UPA and schema handling)
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: XML 2004 -- Make Hotel Room Reservations Today!....more..
• Next by Date: Re: Getting specs/standards right (was UPA and schema handling)
• Previous by thread: Re: Getting specs/standards right (was UPA and schema handling)
• Next by thread: Re: Getting specs/standards right (was UPA and schema handling)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread