• To: 'Liam Quin' <liam@w...>
• Subject: RE: After XQuery, are we done?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:34:59 -0500
• Cc: 'XML Developers List' <xml-dev@l...>

Ok.  I have to think about that.  In ye olde 
days when we were doing the MID, it seemed like 
a good idea.  Now?  Hmm... it feels like dating 
an ex when the current is still a good thing.  

Having just witnessed a flakey HTML form editor 
wipe half the controls on a form leaving lots 
of dangling object references that I will be 
cleaning up in the code editor, I am not too 
sanguine about the state of declarative GUI 
builders that hook to object-oriented code. 
I always wondered where the reduced complexity 
would pop out.  Now I know.

len


From: 'Liam Quin' [mailto:liam@w...]

On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 03:13:09PM -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> So, essentially, pull the just-in-time linking we build 
> into our procedural code out and expose it as declarative 
> code?

Yes.

Liam

• Prev by Date: Re: XSL Running total help
• Next by Date: W3C XML Schema design tools
• Previous by thread: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Next by thread: RE: After XQuery, are we done?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread