• To: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Subject: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:14:28 +0200
• Cc: 'XML Developers List' <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <4177D14E.50003@d...>
• References: <4177D14E.50003@d...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Macintosh/20040913)

Jonathan Robie wrote:
> In http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2004/10/20/deviant.html, Edd Dumbill wrote:
>> A reasonable question to ask, I think, even if the answer isn't quite
>> as vital as it might once have been. XQuery is generally held to be
>> the last great project of XML standardization, and any lessons to be
>> drawn probably won't be applied in the field of XML itself.
> 
> Is XQuery the 'last great project of XML standardization'? Is there 
> anything big on the horizon that still needs to be done?

I would write down binary XML as a possible contender.

-- 
Robin Berjon

• References:
  • After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: After XQuery, are we done?
• Next by Date: RE: After XQuery, are we done?
• Previous by thread: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Next by thread: RE: After XQuery, are we done?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread