• To: "'Tor Helland'" <tor@h...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: xpath union and node set order
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 23:09:34 +0100
• In-reply-to: <002401c4a8c7$4beb8120$0301a8c0@rhuidean>
• Thread-index: AcSox0Haiq+5PizCSwmy/C5g3VgE9AABSK6w

> It's good to hear that the behaviour I hoped for is in the 
> next version.

The bad news is that Microsoft is in no hurry to implement XPath 2.0.

Michael Kay

• References:
  • Re: xpath union and node set order
    • From: "Tor Helland" <tor@h...>

• Prev by Date: Re: xpath union and node set order
• Next by Date: DOMString to char *
• Previous by thread: Re: xpath union and node set order
• Next by thread: DOMString to char *
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread