• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Invalid XML (rant)
• From: richard@i... (Richard Tobin)
• Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 00:13:45 +0100 (BST)
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <FEF4858E8AB32D4EAC2CF2A7D85386EB0B25428D@l...>
• Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

>XSD replaced the term "element type" with "element"

XML Schemas could not reasonably have used the term "element type",
because in SGML and XML that means the class of elements with the same
name, and XML Schema element declarations apply to elements with
the same expanded name, and sometimes only within the scope of another
element.

-- Ricahrd

• References:
  • RE: Invalid XML (rant)
    • From: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: UPA and schema handling
• Next by Date: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Previous by thread: Re: Invalid XML (rant)
• Next by thread: After XQuery, are we done?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread