• To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>
• Subject: RE: UPA and schema handling
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:54:06 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@i...>, Ian Graham <ian.graham@u...>, Bob Foster <bob@o...>, "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1027670A9@R...>

>  Now companies like Microsoft now have to deal with angry customers who
> complain that our tools reject their schemas which were authored with
> the "industry's leading XML tool" or which have now become standards in
> their particular business sphere. ...

You do recognize the irony here, right?

I betcha that your message gets posted up in thousands of cubes around the
world, with sarcastic headings like, "Aww, too bad..."

	/r$

--
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview      http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

• References:
  • RE: UPA and schema handling
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML Data Modellling/Linking (was RE: AfterXQuery, are we done?)
• Next by Date: RE: After XQuery, are we done?
• Previous by thread: Re: UPA and schema handling
• Next by thread: RE: Getting specs/standards right (was UPA and schema handling)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread