[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


Then, If XML Namespaces are a *big mess*, which other alternatives can be designed to address the problems that the XML Namespaces spec covers?
 
Regards,
 
Sergio Rodríguez. 

"Edward C. Zimmermann" <edz@b...> wrote:
Quoting Elliotte Harold :

> Sergio J. Rodriguez M. wrote:
>
> > If Namespaces are in fact a disaster, then why is widely used in any XML
> > Vocabulary, like RDF or OWL?
>
> Because we didn't know better six years ago. Some things you only learn
> from brutal experience.

We DID know better. Just nobody listened to us as old SGML fools.



Do You Yahoo!?
http://net.yahoo.com.mx: La mejor conexión a internet y 25MB extra a tu correo por http://net.yahoo.com.mx/.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member