Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> XML canonicalisation. In particular, I want to avoid the complexities > that result from combining XML 1.0 canonicalisation with namespaces > (e.g. Exclusive XML canonicalization :-) Once you done the work of C14N, exc-c14n isn't that much more. :) Less flippantly, I took a look at RIG2 and skimmed RIG3. It seems like the combination of limitations on xmlns (not at the docroot, no bleed-thru, no use of alternate prefixes, etc) means that you're essentially outlawing the ability to use a layered SOAP implementation. Was that the intent? Also requirement 25 in RIG2 (no superfluous declarations) seems redundant since RIG2 already mandates RIG3. /r$ -- Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html XML Security Overview http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
|
