• To: 'XML Developers List' <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 21:42:58 -0400
• In-reply-to: <20041022152333.HAS1100.mta09-svc.ntlworld.com@Turtle>
• References: <20041022152333.HAS1100.mta09-svc.ntlworld.com@Turtle>

On Oct 22, 2004, at 11:22 AM, Michael Kay wrote:

> Hyperlinks belong in the user interface space, XML should represent
> information independently of the user interface. It was always
> architecturally wrong to do hyperlinking at the XML level and the 
> attempt
> should not be repeated.
>
> "Modelling relationships in XML" - that would be different.

What is a hyperlink if not a relationship? The interpretation and 
presentation are obviously application-specific, but...

• References:
  • RE: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: xml-entity PI
• Next by Date: Re: XML Data Modellling/Linking (was RE: Afte r XQuery, are we done?)
• Previous by thread: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Next by thread: RE: After XQuery, are we done?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread