• To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@i...>
• Subject: Re: New release (2.8) of XSV
• From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 10:11:01 -0700
• Cc: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>, xmlschema-dev@w...,xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <f5b8yahqiit.fsf@e...>
• References: <f5bfz4pvc2n.fsf@e...> <4166BCB7.6020309@j...> <f5b8yahqiit.fsf@e...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> The really good news is that this approach doesn't require XSV to punt
> in the face of large exponents, which it used to do (i.e. treated all
> numbers > 100 in min/maxOccurs as if they _were_ 100).  All other
> existing processors do something similar (that is, punt above some
> number), I believe.

I believe XercesJ will attempt any exponent (I have seen it attempt 
maxOccurs="256"), though it will run out of memory for large ones.

Bob Foster

• References:
  • New release (2.8) of XSV
    • From: ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson)
  • Re: New release (2.8) of XSV
    • From: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>
  • Re: New release (2.8) of XSV
    • From: ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: Re: New release (2.8) of XSV
• Next by Date: RE: JAXP 1.3 for Java 1.4?
• Previous by thread: Re: New release (2.8) of XSV
• Next by thread: Re: New release (2.8) of XSV
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread