Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Bullard, Claude L (Len) <len.bullard@i...> writes: > > I agree with that. It does have a graph model which is > what I thought the question was. Nah, that would be too easy... :-) > Overloading schemas? It raises the archforms question again, > but the declarative techniques were simple. > > We're noodling at solutions for which I'm not yet convinced > there is a market, but this is XML-Dev and we are supposed > to do that. Ahh, good, I thought perhaps I was just suffering from the effects of too much caffeine and not enough breakfast just before rushing off to lunch: I'll take standardized universal knowledge interchange and a tuna salad on wheat berry please.... > len > > > From: Hunsberger, Peter [mailto:Peter.Hunsberger@S...] > > Well RDF seems to be the answer that keeps popping up in this > thread and as I've said, I do think it's part of the answer. > I'm just not sure it's the complete answer. You've still got > the problem of addressability which then drags in ontologies > or link bases. As soon as you drag in either of those you've > got the problem of query mechanisms and given the current > state of the art and the amount of machinery you need to > manage and move around to handle all that I'm not sure you > have anything approaching a universal solution? > > >
|
