• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Partyin' like it's 1999
• From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
• Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:06:11 -0400
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=RRnFLX6XpwHPAkEMqyL+Y55c+5KfhWDopj5Mlex0RwcjXazGJmABdTwCCSVibHzO2rWV8TvyvHH1ZdqebvDQRxhBYwsOqin69om3Duqm/oOr4n55yL4DH6fkuJNE4gtLtGL803KavD0x27qriwdRmkAw8oVAmYVHLS+IO6nRG6A=
• In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1038BE183@R...>
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1038BE183@R...>
• Reply-to: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:27:56 -0700, Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...> wrote:

> True. A lot of the complaints at the XML DevCon Mike Champion references
> are more from XML tool builders than from XML users. 

Yup.  Users can ignore the cruft, just voting with their feet against
stuff that causes more pain than gain.  Tool builders don't have the
option, unless they want to be labelled non-conformant.  That's pretty
much a kiss of death in a competitive market.

• References:
  • RE: Partyin' like it's 1999
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Can a CDSect be split across entity boundaraies?
• Next by Date: Re: Partyin' like it's 1999
• Previous by thread: RE: Partyin' like it's 1999
• Next by thread: RE: Partyin' like it's 1999
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread