• To: "'ht@i...'" <ht@i...>
• Subject: RE: XSD and "elements"
• From: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@l...>
• Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:19:11 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

Henry Thompson wrote:

>>what is an element declaration declaring

>the REC never needs to refer to that concept

Well, I suggest that "manages to avoid" might be more accurate than "never
needs to." I understand that an XSD schema can have a top level declaration
for para and two other local ones. In language consistent with XSD
vocabulary, can we fill in the blank and say that each of these three
declarations is declaring a ____________? 

Otherwise, you've got a spec that describes declarations without making it
clear what they're declaring (element declarations aren't declaring
elements?), which I find it pretty confusing. 

Bob

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RE: XSD and "elements"
    • From: Burak Emir <Burak.Emir@e...>
  • RE: RE: XSD and "elements"
    • From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
  • Re: XSD and "elements"
    • From: ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: Re: More questions about conformance and entities
• Next by Date: RE: XML Data Modellling/Linking (was RE: Afte rXQuery, are we done?)
• Previous by thread: More questions about conformance and entities
• Next by thread: Re: XSD and "elements"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread