• To: 'Ronald Bourret' <rpbourret@r...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Partyin' like it's 1999
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:07:43 -0500

Actually, some have.  That is how GJXDM works.

The SHARE net may drive out more uses for that 
approach.  When we have federal dbs that have to 
be able to look into private dbs and return 
query values, common means to describe common 
elements such as names become very useful. My 
guess is most people are still building on point 
to point interfaces.  The day of the service-discovery 
paradigm isn't quite here yet.

len

From: Ronald Bourret [mailto:rpbourret@r...]

I think one thing that has not happened is that nobody has created and 
reused those dozens of modular schemas for things like addresses and 
names that we all imagined five years ago.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Partyin' like it's 1999
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: After XQuery, are we done?
• Next by Date: RE: Partyin' like it's 1999
• Previous by thread: Re: Partyin' like it's 1999
• Next by thread: Re: Partyin' like it's 1999
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread