• To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:22:13 -0400
• In-reply-to: <1E0CC447E59C974CA5C7160D2A2854EC02FECF31@S...>
• References: <1E0CC447E59C974CA5C7160D2A2854EC02FECF31@S...>

On Oct 25, 2004, at 12:21 PM, Hunsberger, Peter wrote:
>> I've seen all kinds of data, including graphs, encoded in
>> XML, just as
>> I have seen such data structures encoded in ASCII.
>
> Sure, but with an XML representation of a graph you're back to the
> application to parse the XML serialization into a graph. You haven't
> exchanged a graph, you've exchanged something that, given enough extra
> knowledge, someone else might be able to build a graph out of.

You have to do that anyway (unless you're using shared memory that is).

• References:
  • RE: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@S...>

• Prev by Date: RELAX NG pluggable type libraries
• Next by Date: Re: Testing XPath
• Previous by thread: RE: After XQuery, are we done?
• Next by thread: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread