• To: 'XML Developers List' <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: XML Data Modellling/Linking (was RE: AfterXQuery, are we done?)
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 22:06:35 -0400
• In-reply-to: <1098520140.3762.23.camel@homer>
• References: <200410222115.i9MLFsEY097139@n...> <e3a5cb2c0410222028131ad691@m...> <1098511602.17116.146.camel@delleric> <1098520140.3762.23.camel@homer>

On Oct 23, 2004, at 4:29 AM, Dave Pawson wrote:
> Re the links, if inline markup is unsatisfactory, how about the
> extra-instance ideas from extreme, would they more appropriately 
> address
> the links issue?

Part of the idea behind ARA is to provide a single model that could be 
used to address into things other than XML using the same mechanism 
you'd use in linking into XML. In fact, you could layer Xlink on top of 
ARA on top of email messages, or latex documents.

• References:
  • RE: XML Data Modellling/Linking (was RE: AfterXQuery, are we done?)
    • From: rpbourret@r...
  • Re: XML Data Modellling/Linking (was RE: AfterXQuery, are we done?)
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
  • Re: XML Data Modellling/Linking (was RE: AfterXQuery, are we done?)
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: XML Data Modellling/Linking (was RE: AfterXQuery, are we done?)
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Data Modellling/Linking
• Next by Date: RE: XML Data Modellling/Linking (was RE: Afte r XQuery, are we done?)
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Data Modellling/Linking (was RE: AfterXQuery, are we done?)
• Next by thread: RE: XML Data Modellling/Linking (was RE: AfterXQuery, are we done?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread