• To: "'Hunsberger, Peter'" <Peter.Hunsberger@S...>,"'Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)'" <len.bullard@i...>,"'Eric van der Vlist'" <vdv@d...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:37:53 +0100
• In-reply-to: <1E0CC447E59C974CA5C7160D2A2854EC02FECEDF@S...>
• Thread-index: AcSlZ+ZV94LoyAWZROaDH0xyXxhNvgAACYkgAARQkQA=

> I suppose so, personally, I don't expect archives to give me 
> much in the
> way of dynamic capabilities or currency. Having said that, I am not a
> big believer in using XML as an archive format except for audit
> purposes.
> 

It's being used extensively by professionals in the field of digital
archiving: what would you advise them to use instead?

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
    • From: James Landrum <james.landrum@n...>
  • Re: Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
    • From: Micah Dubinko <micah@d...>

• References:
  • RE: Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
    • From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@S...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
• Next by Date: RE: Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
• Previous by thread: RE: Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
• Next by thread: Re: Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread