• To: 'Michael Kay' <michael.h.kay@n...>, 'Rick Marshall' <rjm@z...>
• Subject: RE: Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:27:08 -0500
• Cc: "'Hunsberger, Peter'" <Peter.Hunsberger@S...>, 'Jonathan Robie' <jonathan.robie@d...>, 'Eric van der Vlist' <vdv@d...>, xml-dev@l...

Shoot away.  I deal with realities.   XML is helpful 
wherever the information is referentially complete 
and snap-shot robust.  The hard problem is the medium. 

How well an archival technology works is directly 
related to the model of the information from which 
it was extracted and the lifecycle robustness of 
the medium to which it is stored.  XML Doesn't Care.

len


From: Michael Kay [mailto:michael.h.kay@n...]
 
> An archive is quite often 'a pile of stuff in the attic'.
> 

No-one has shot you yet, so we obviously don't have any professional
archivists on the list.

Michael Kay

• Prev by Date: RE: Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
• Next by Date: Re: [Fwd: Potential Gap (WAS Re: [owl-s] communication between web services)]
• Previous by thread: Re: Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
• Next by thread: xsl question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread