• To: Rex Brooks <rexb@s...>
• Subject: Re: XACML Research.
• From: seth proctor <Seth.Proctor@S...>
• Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 23:56:15 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <a06110408bd6f73a00a6c@[67.101.98.216]>
• References: <09495D95A51DD740AA3258E96CA66A1E09BA4C@T...><414996BB.6E3E4906@b...> <a06110408bd6f73a00a6c@[67.101.98.216]>
• Sender: Seth.Proctor@S...
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2)Gecko/20040803

Rex Brooks wrote:
> Since I happen to be using XACML right now, and I did not know that it 
> would be a good bet to carry forward into the future, I'm pleased to 
> understand that it apparently has a longer shelf life than I had 
> anticipated.

 From what I've seen over the last 6-9 months, XACML is indeed picking 
up a lot of steam. It's being picked up in a number of large projects 
that I know about, and probably many others (like yours) that I don't 
know are out there. Pretty much everyone I talk with likes what they 
see, and are enthusiastically planning how to grow XACML use. I would 
expect it to stick around for a little while still :)


seth

• References:
  • RE: XACML Research.
    • From: "Diego M. Gonzalez" <diegog@l...>
  • Re: XACML Research.
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
  • Re: XACML Research.
    • From: Rex Brooks <rexb@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XACML Research.
• Next by Date: XACML PDF Documentation
• Previous by thread: Re: XACML Research.
• Next by thread: Re: XACML Research.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread