• Subject: RE: Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
• From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
• Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:54:27 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <1E0CC447E59C974CA5C7160D2A2854EC02FECEE5@S...>
• References: <1E0CC447E59C974CA5C7160D2A2854EC02FECEE5@S...>
• Reply-to: davep@d...

On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 22:43, Hunsberger, Peter wrote:

> That's a good topic, but I think just part of the thread.  Personally, I
> was (at least at some point (no pun intended)) attacking the question of
> when to use XML. For me, even when addressing the question of archive, I
> see more value in XML as an interchange format than I do in a archive
> format.  

Isn't an archive just an instance of an interchange, over time?
I lay it down today,
you pick it up in 5 years time (I can't get my head round opening
any electronic archive in 100 years Michael :-)


-- 
Regards DaveP.
XSLT&Docbook  FAQ
http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• References:
  • RE: Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
    • From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@S...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
• Next by Date: RE: Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
• Previous by thread: Re: Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
• Next by thread: RE: Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread