• To: Bryan Rasmussen <bry@i...>
• Subject: Re: restriction design, inherit processContents="lax" formy namespace
• From: ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson)
• Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 14:49:52 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <1094735911.414058274b38b@h...> (Bryan Rasmussen'smessage of "Thu, 9 Sep 2004 15:18:31 +0200")
• References: <1094735911.414058274b38b@h...>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security ThroughObscurity, linux)

Bryan Rasmussen <bry@i...> writes:


> If I do the following restriction
> 	
> <complexType name="InvoiceType">
> <complexContent>
> <restriction base="pie:laxInvoiceType">
> <sequence>
>  <element ref="com:ID"/>
>  <element ref="com:IssueDate"/>
>  <element ref="pie:TypeCode" maxOccurs="1"/>
>  <element ref="com:SellerParty"/>
>  . . .
> </restriction>
> </complexContent>
> </complexType>
>
> <complexType name="laxInvoiceType">
> <sequence>
>  <any namespace="http://thecomnamespace" processContents="lax" 
> 	   minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
>  <element ref="pie:TypeCode" maxOccurs="1"/>
>  <element ref="main:InvoiceCurrencyCode" minOccurs="0"/>
>  <any namespace="http://thecomnamespace" processContents="lax" 
> 	   minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
> </sequence>
> </complexType>
>
> will that mean that all the elements in the com namespace under my
> pie:Invoice will be processed Lax?

No.  There's no such thing as lax processing of items being validated
by a declared element, unless/until an error occurs or an explicit
wildcard is involved.

> Any good xsd lists to send this too anyway?

xmlschema-dev@w... (subscribe via xmlschema-dev-request@w...,
archives at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/)

ht
-- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@i...
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

• References:
  • restriction design, inherit processContents="lax" for my namespace
    • From: Bryan Rasmussen <bry@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [schema] which assertions can't you express ?
• Next by Date: RE: [schema] which assertions can't you express ?
• Previous by thread: restriction design, inherit processContents="lax" for my namespace
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread