• To: Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@b...>
• Subject: Re: WS-Addressing to W3C: Is the Tide Turning?
• From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>
• Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:50:19 -0400
• Cc: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <411B6184.183D337A@b...>
• References: <411A1651.60E0F7CD@b...> <20040812121034.GJ14122@m...> <411B6184.183D337A@b...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 08:24:36AM -0400, Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> these mechanisms, if employed, can help "future-proof" an implementation
> by enabling the addressing and endpoint identification capabilities to
> hold, no matter what transport mechanisms may be used in the future. 

Gee, for a moment there, I thought you were talking about URNs...

Mark.

• References:
  • WS-Addressing to W3C: Is the Tide Turning?
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
  • Re: WS-Addressing to W3C: Is the Tide Turning?
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>
  • Re: WS-Addressing to W3C: Is the Tide Turning?
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: WS-Addressing to W3C: Is the Tide Turning?
• Next by Date: RE: WS-Addressing to W3C: Is the Tide Turning?
• Previous by thread: Re: WS-Addressing to W3C: Is the Tide Turning?
• Next by thread: Re: WS-Addressing to W3C: Is the Tide Turning?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread