• To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Slides from "Web Services Security Issues"
• From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:47:43 -0400
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9FB70@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9FB70@h...>

On Aug 18, 2004, at 11:03 AM, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

>  This quote argues the
> opposite position and might suggest that the XML Binary efforts
> are not misguided:
>

A timely re-opening of this permathread, since I'm writing my XML 2004 
paper reviewing what is actually known on this topic :-)

I for one would especially appreciate pointers to actual benchmarks and 
code profiling efforts that attempt to identify the bottlenecks in 
XML-based applications, e.g. which compares the overhead of actual text 
parsing to that of tree building, compression/decompression, network 
latency, database queries, whatever.

• References:
  • RE: Slides from "Web Services Security Issues"
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Slides from "Web Services Security Issues"
• Next by Date: RE: Slides from "Web Services Security Issues"
• Previous by thread: RE: Slides from "Web Services Security Issues"
• Next by thread: RE: Slides from "Web Services Security Issues"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread