Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 11:17 AM +0100 6/10/04, Bill de hÓra wrote: >You really don't understand what this thread is about, do you? > Actually, Bill I'm afraid it's you who is confused. Apologies if I confused you. I did wonder how in one sentence you'd say I was totally wrong and in the next sentence you'd say you agreed with me. The question at hand is when one is publishing data should it be published in XML+Namespaces or in RDF. You're allowed to use any reasonably priced tools on top of this you care to. The availability of high quality, free parsers is a big reason XML is superior to custom binary formats, for example. Are there high quality RDF tools that enable one to do things with RDF data that can't be as easily done with the high quality XML tools operating on the XML data? If so, that's useful information. For me, it's still an open question. -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@m... Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003) http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA
|
