• To: 'Liam Quin' <liam@w...>, Michael Kay <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Subject: RE: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:22:32 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

So be fair. Hold them in India.

Let's see what clout the W3C has left as US software 
company support peels away because the Americans 
are increasingly reluctant to fly OCONUS, and CNET 
has informed us that standards are irrelevant 
compared to open specifications (you get to keep 
the IP, sell books, and no one can claim you 
are keeping them out of the market - just the 
committee).

len


From: 'Liam Quin' [mailto:liam@w...]

On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 11:21:09AM +0100, Michael Kay wrote:
> It's certainly not surprising that a WG that holds all its meetings in the
> US has more participants from the US.

Agreed, although we've had meetings in France for example... and
one coming up in Australia...  so not all inthe US,but, for
that Working Group, yes, mostly in the US :-(

• Prev by Date: Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
• Next by Date: ANN: Oracle XDK 10.1.0.2.0 for AIX, HP-UX64 and LINUX production release
• Previous by thread: RE: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
• Next by thread: RE: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread