• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 20:36:57 -0400
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F8C9@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F8C9@h...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502)

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

I guess one might inquire
> how well the Semantic Web architecture provides solutions 
> to these smaller problems and how well that coheres at 
> scale.

I would say, rather, that the Semantic Web aims to provide some means to 
combine many partial strategies.  New strategies will always keep 
popping up.  None of them constitute the core of the Semantic Web, and 
all of them are potential grist for teh SemWeb mill.

Cheers,

Tom P

• References:
  • RE: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [ xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
• Next by Date: Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
• Previous by thread: RE: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
• Next by thread: RE: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [ xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread